The Simpsons Movie covered then-current hot button topics of environmentalism and religious fundamentalism, and The Simpsons itself is making changes to address a more enlightened social climate. It also gives The Simpsons a chance to address social issues. Now, a new film under Disney gives The Simpsons a chance to poke fun at their own corporate ownership. The Simpsons Movie felt subversive again, breaking the fourth wall with Homer addressing the audience, Maggie demanding a “sequel,” and inserting visuals gags referring to itself as a cash grab. The show has struggled to address the zeitgeist when it was the zeitgeist.
The first eight seasons were so successful because they satirized the nuclear family of 80s sitcoms, but its unprecedented success and heavy merchandising transformed the series into a dominant force within pop culture. In fact, a new film under Disney could show The Simpsons adjusting to its own legacy. Disney could provide the right environment for The Simpsons team to release a film on their terms. However, producer Michael Price said Disney’s purchase of Fox has not affected the show’s production and older episodes are not censored, saying the longtime staff is able to “make the show that we've been doing for 32 years.” Jean showed enthusiasm about producing the fun Disney+ tie-in shorts with Marvel and Lucasfilm, which easily could’ve been nothing more than cheap products of corporate synergy. The company met early backlash when episodes of the original show were released on Disney+ in the incorrect aspect ratio, cutting out key gags. It's important for Disney to show their reverence for one of the most influential television shows of all-time, and not treat it as another property to mine content from. Their strategy is leaning in a direction that would support giving a new Simpsons film the theatrical fanfare it deserves.
However, Disney recently announced a guaranteed theatrical window for the rest of its 2021 slate, including other 20th Century Studios releases. Given the number of spinoff projects from their major properties made available on Disney+, the definition of a “film” is changing.
During the early stages of the pandemic, Disney sent many of its intended theatrical releases to Disney+ either for free or as an add-on through the transactional “Premier Access” label. Jean’s concerns about distribution are well-warranted. RELATED: 'The Simpsons': The 11 Best Guest Stars Who Didn't Play Themselves However, the risk is one worth taking for both the show’s staff and Disney. Audiences may have finally been fatigued with the declining quality and show faded enthusiasm, or not show up at all. Perhaps the years have strained the creative juice of the creators and writing staff to the point that a new film might not be able to replicate their success with The Simpsons Movie. Jean told Collider earlier this year that while they were in early talks, he only wanted to move forward if it could be a theatrical experience, and not a direct-to-Disney+ miniseries.Ī new Simpsons film is certainly a risk. However, last year producer Al Jean revealed that creator Matt Groening believed a new standalone film would happen. Viewers are used to consistently getting new episodes weekly for over three decades, so a Simpsons film needed to tell a story that justified being in theaters. It's understandable that despite The Simpsons Movie’s popularity, conceiving of another film was not a quick process. The shows’ creators faced an extensive workload simultaneously producing the film and new episodes of the series, but under pressure they created a hilarious, heartfelt, and culturally-savvy Simpsons adventure. The last time The Simpsons truly felt exciting was in 2007, following the release of The Simpsons Movie. The show’s notorious decline has been documented extensively, and while longtime fans may debate on when it truly “died,” the announcement of a 33rd and 34th season was met with little fanfare. It’s been a long time since The Simpsons has been relevant.